Fair Warning: This post discusses the 1972 film, Solaris, and the novel by Stanislaw Lem on which the film is based. If you have not seen the film or its remake in 2002, nor read the book but intend to do so, the following post contains spoilers.
Near the end of Andrey Tarkovsky’s 1972 film, Solaris, based on the novel with the same name by Stanislaw Lem, the main character Kris Kelvin wakes to find that his lover, Hari, a being recreated from Kelvin’s own dreams and imperfect memories of his deceased former lover on Earth, by the planet’s sentient ocean as a way to interact with the humans, no longer existed. Kelvin knew that Hari had found out that she was an artificial creation from Kelvin’s past. The longer she stayed with Kris, the more human she became, and the more difficult the eventual ending would be, for it was reasoned that she would not be able to exist apart from Solaris. Hari, who was made up of “neutrino matter” unlike ordinary matter, had asked Dr. Snaut and his brilliant but completely lacking in empathy colleague, Dr. Sartorius, to use their annihilator device on her. Snaut tells Kelvin that “there was a flash and a puff of wind. A faint puff. Nothing more.”
Hari’s demise was particularly bitter for Kelvin; his past lover on Earth had committed suicide. Kelvin tells Snaut that he wants to fly down to the planet, immediately raising Snaut’s suspicious about Kelvin’s motive. Kelvin reassures him that he will return. Kelvin flies down to the planet and lands on an island. At this point, Tarkovsky’s film and the novel diverge, but only in details and not on the hopes of the main character. In the film, Kelvin is shown as having returned to the surroundings of his family home. When he walks up to the house, his aged father comes out to meet him. As the film ends, the camera view of the house zooms out, farther and farther, until we see an island surrounded by the dark ocean of Solaris.
One may ask, which existence is the real one and which is the imagined? Do Kelvin’s memories of his family and past lover on Earth represent reality or does his experience depicted at the end of Tarkovsky’s film represent reality? Or do both experiences have equal weight as being real? Clearly Tarkovsky’s visual ending in the film sides with Kelvin’s past memories as being representative of reality. How would Kelvin be able to discern the real and the imagined?
Many of us have had to deal with something resembling multiple realities when we find ourselves in extremely different settings, separated in time and space. Not only the settings are different but the rules of our behavior and accepted ethics may be different in each setting. With the appearance of the “guests”, as they were called by the Solaris station crew, novelist Lem challenges us with a moral dilemna. Though made of a different type of matter, the guests are material beings and develop their independent humanity over time. Kelvin is chided by the two remaining crew members for his emotional attachment to the recreated Hari. Snaut, both in sympathy with Kelvin, and in frustration with his naivete, says, “I’m telling you for the last time: this, here, this is a situation beyond morality.” Yet, it is Kelvin’s emotional bond to his guest, his attempt to treat her humanely, and his own self-deluded plans for their future together (he is fully cognizant of his own self-delusion), which may have saved him from descending into the cynicism and apathy of Snaut, or into the complete lack of empathy exhibited by Sartorius towards fellow humans and their guests on the station.
The Russian film, Solaris, was Tarkovsky’s answer to Stanley Kubrick’s science-fiction film, 2001: A Space Odyssey. Author, Stanislaw Lem, reacted badly to Tarkovsky’s film adaptation of his novel. Lem criticized the film for reducing the larger themes in his novel of the inherent difficulty in establishing contact and communication between two vastly different sentiences to romantic problems between two people. Lem’s criticism is too severe. Tarkovsky’s film captures well the moral dilemna and guilt faced by Kelvin, as depicted in the novel, and the film’s depiction of Kelvin, Snaut, Sartorius, and Hari are on-spot with the novel. Both the film, 2001: A Space Odyssey and Tarkovsky’s film version of Solaris are grand achievements in cinema, and I find both of them moving, maybe on different planes of intellect. My own homage of sorts to both Lem and Tarkovsky, and also to J.S. Bach for the film’s title score, may be found here,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLLjrHL2vwY
Krishna Myneni
8 August 2021

